Supreme Court of India
ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.·versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
- Citation
- [2017] 4 S.C.R. 78
- Decided
- 9 June 2017
- Disposal
- Rejected
- Bench
- ASHOK BHUSHAN
Holding
The Supreme Court held that the order dated 09‑05‑2017 pertains only to undergraduate medical admissions and not to postgraduate courses, rendering the applications for extension of counselling time unfounded.
Summary
The petitioners, two private universities, sought the Supreme Court's intervention to extend the time for completing post‑graduate medical counselling, relying on the Court's order dated 09‑05‑2017 and a subsequent Ministry of Health circular dated 26‑05‑2017. The State of Madhya Pradesh contended that the first, second and mop‑up counselling rounds were completed by 31‑05‑2017 and that no seats remained unfilled due to lack of candidates, rendering any extension unnecessary. The Court examined whether the 09‑05‑2017 order, which directed the State to determine vacant seats and forward a list of candidates ten times the vacancies, applied to postgraduate courses or only to undergraduate (MBBS) admissions. By analysing earlier orders dated 03‑05‑2017, 27‑04‑2017 and the context of the 09‑05‑2017 directions, the Court concluded that the order was confined to undergraduate admissions and did not govern postgraduate counselling. Consequently, the Ministry's circular was held to be issued on a misconceived basis, and the universities' applications for extension of time were deemed unfounded. All intervention applications were rejected.
Issues considered
- The applicability of the Supreme Court's order dated 09‑05‑2017 to postgraduate medical course admissions.
- Whether the Ministry of Health circular dated 26‑05‑2017, issued on the basis of the 09‑05‑2017 order, is effective for postgraduate counselling.
- Whether an extension of time for completing postgraduate counselling can be granted under the said order.
Subjects
admission counsellingpost‑graduate medical coursesextension of timeSupreme Court orderMinistry of Health circularunder‑graduate admissionsintervention applicationmedical education
Judgment
[2017] 4 S.C.R. 78
A ASHISH RANJAN AND ORS.·
v...
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(I.A. Nos, 45538, 45540 and 45542 of2017)
B PEOPLE'S UNIVERSITY· ... APPLICANT .
with
(LA. Nos. 45855, 45856 and '45859 of 2017)
MALWANCHAL UNIVERSITY INDORE ... APPLICANT
c Ill
(Writ Petition (Civil) No. 76.of2015)
JUNE 09, 2017
[ASHOK BHUSHAN AND DEEPAKGU.PTA, JJ,]
D Education/ Educational Institutions: ·
Admission to Medical Colleges - Counselling for admission
in Post-Graduate Courses - Applications seeking extension of time
for completing the counselling in accordance with the order of this
Court dated 09.05.2017 such that unfilled seats in the Applicants'
E Units be filled up - Submissions by the State that the first and second
counsellings were completed within time, MOP-up counselling was
. also conducted and completed on 31.05:2017 and admissions have
been completed and some seats could not be filled up because no
student opted for those seats, thus, no growid to grant any extension
F of time beyond 31.05.2017 - Held: Order dated 09.05.2017 is
confined to admission to Under-Graduate Courses only and not
related to PG Courses - In order dated 09. 05.2017, the State
Government was directed to determine the number of seats that are
still vacant and thereafter, to forward a list of students in order of
merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant seals to the Medical
G College such that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any
College, the said seat may be filled up from the said list- Jn admission
to the PG Courses both merit and preference of candidates are
looked into - Had the Court by issuance of direction in order dated
09.05.2017 intended the sending often times the number of vacancies
H
78
ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 79
of each PG Courses,· there would have been further elaboration A
pertaining to discipline and drawing of inter se merit - Furthermore,
when the order dated 09. 05.2017 is itself not applicable to PG .
Courses, the Government Circular dated 26.05.2017 issued in
misconception that order dated 09.05.2017 iS applicable to PG ·
Courses, is also not effective - Thus, the applications are unfounded
B
and applicants not entitled to any relief . ·
CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: l.A. Nos. 45538, 45540
and 45542of2017
WITH
I.A. Nos. 45855, 45856 and 45859 of20 I 7 in Writ Petition (Civil) c
No. 76 of2015.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution oflndia.
Venkateswara Rao Anumolu, Adv. for the·Petition'ers.
S. S. Shamshery, AAG., Ajit Sinha, Salman Khurshid, Sr. Advs., D
Ajay Sharma, Ms. Rekha Pandey, R. K. Rathore, G. S. Makker, Ravi
Kant, Ranjay Kumar Pandey, Amit Sharma, Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advs. for
the ,Respondents.
The Order of the Court was delivered by
E
ASHOK BHUSHAN, J. I. These applications have been filed
by two private Universities, namely, People's University and Malwanchal
University Indore. In both the applications Applicants have made identical
prayers which are to the following effect:
."In view of the above it is most respectfully prayed that this
Hon 'ble Court may be pleased to: F
a) Allow the present application for intervention;
b) Permit the applicant to intervene in the presellf Petition;
and
c) Pass such other and further orders as this Hon 'ble Court G
may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of
the present case. "
2. The case of the Applicants is that the State ofMadhya Pradesh
conducted counselling for admission in Postgraduate Medical Courses
H
80 . SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.'
A as per·schedule dated 03.05.2017. It is stated that there was delay in
··holding first and second counselling. Two counsellings were completed,
first between 11.05.2017 to 20.05.2017 and second between 23.05.2017
to 29.05.2017.
3. Reliance has been placed by the Applicants on orc!er dated
· 09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of20l 7 and the circular
B
dated 26'h May, 2017 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of
Health and Welfare consequent to the aforesaid order of this Court dated
09.05.2017. It is contended thatthere was an order of Madhya Pradesh
High Court in Writ Petition No.7900 of2017 dated 29.05.2017. Before
the High Comt the State.·Government has submitted that cou11sell ing will
c be completed on 31.05.2017 as per directions of this Court.
4. Learned counsel submits that as per order dated 09.05.2017
for manual admission process after ascertainment of the number of seats
vacant, only 30 minutes time was left between I 1.30 PM and 12 PM on ·
31.05.2017. It is further stated that revised schedule which was published
D on 30.05.2017 does not indicate that the compliance of the order of this
Court dated 09.05.2017 was ensured. It was further contended that no
list of the students as contemplated by order dated 09.05.2017 was
provided by the State, consequently 17 seats in Peoples College of Medical
Sciences and Research Centre, I0 seats in Peoples College of Dental
Sciences and Research Centre and 12 seats in Peoples Dental Academy
E could not be filled. It is useful to refer to the avennents made in paragraph
10 of the People's. . University
. . . . Application to the following .e.ffect:.
:
. "JO. That afte~ the aforesaid order, i;lated 29.05.2017, passed
. in IBP. No. 790012017, the State Government issued the order,
d(lted 29. 05,2017, prescribing inter alia that as per the
F circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health
.· ·. · ' and Fainily·Welfare, the seats would be filled up on 31.05.2017
after 7 PM ·However, ·the aforesaid schedule was further
revised on 30.05.2017 and now only 30 minutes lime i.e. 11:30
PM to 12 PM on 31.05.2017 is given to the applicant and
otl1el· colleges io fill up the vacant seats as perthr: notification
G dated 26.05.2017, · · . ' .
'
As directed, the representatives of the applicant were present
at the scheduled time. but no list of student was given and the
State of MP. has not only violated this Hon. Court's order,
dated 09.05.2017 passed in WP.(C)No.26712017 read with
H
ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF JNDIA AND OTHERS 81
[ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.]
circular, dated 26.05.2017 issued by the Ministry of Health A
and Family Welfare but the ordeY,. dated 29.05.2017 passed
by the Hon. High Court of MP in WP No. 790012017 as well.
·As the consequences were inevitable, following seats are still
lying vacant:
B
S.NO. .. NAME OF CONSTITUENT NUMBER OF
UNIT VACANT SEATS
1. Peoples College ofMedical 17 seats
Science~ and Research
Centre c
2. Peoples College ofDental JO seats
Sciences and Research
Centre
3. Peoples Dental Academy 12 seats
D
5. In.the applicati~n filed on behalf ofMalwanchal University
Indor~ also si;nilar averments were 1nade and it is further stated that in
the Constituent Unit of the University that is Peoples College of Medical
Sciences and Research Centre, 17 seats could not be filled up.
E
6. Learned counsel fotthe Applicants- on the aforesaid premise
prayed that the time for completing the counsellin·g in accordance with
the order dated 09.05.2017 be extended so that un,tfoed seats in the
Applicants' Units be filled up.
7. Learned coui1sel for State of Madhya Pradesh refuted the F
submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicants. It is
contended thatthe first and second counsellings were completed within
time. Mop-up counselling was also conducted and completed on 31"
May, 2017 and admissions have been completed. Some seats could not
·be filled up because no student opted for those seats. It is subniitted that
there is absolutely i10 ground to grantany extension of time beyond 31" a·
May, 2017 as .prayed by the Applicants.
8. Shri Gaurav Sharma, learned comiselappearing for the Medical
Council oflndia submits that order dated 09.05.2017 passed in Writ
Petition (C) No.267of2017 relied on by the Applicants does not relate
H
82 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.
A to admission ii1 PG Courses. He submits that order dated 09.05.2017
was issued with regard to admission in MBBS Courses. Hence, very
basis of the Application is unfounded. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred
to order dated 03.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition(C) No.261and292 of
2017, and other Writ PetitiOns which, according to him, dearly mentioned
that matter was further directed to be listed on 4ih May, 2017 for
B
considering the procedure for admission in Under-Graduate Courses.
He submits that order dated 09.05.2017 has to be confined to admission
to the MBBS Courses only and not relating to Postgraduate Courses.
9. We have considered the submissions of the parties and perused
the records.
c
I0. The very basis of the Applications filed by both the Universities,
is the order dated 09.05.2017 passed by this Court in Writ Petition(C)
No.267of2017 and other Writ Petitions reliance has been placed by the
learned counsel on the direction No. 7 which is to the following effect:
D "7. In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remain
vacant after the counselling the State Government or the
authority designated by the State Government shall conduct
manual counselling for allot111e11t of students. After the
completion counselling, the State Government shall determine
the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall
E forward a list of students in order of merit, equaling to ten
times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so
that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the
said seat may be filled up from the said list. "
11. Applicants have also relied on circular issued by the Government
F oflndia, Ministry ofHealth and Family Welfare dated 26.05.2017 which
is to the following effect:
"Sub: Counseling for admission in PG Course in Medical
Colleges - regarding
Sir /Madam
G
In continuation to this Ministry s letter of even number dated
JI. 05.20I 7 on the subject mentioned, I am directed to
reproduce para-7 of the order of Hon 'ble Supreme Court
passed on 09:05.20I7 in WP© No. 26712017 in the matter of
DAR· US-Slam Educational Trust Vis Medical Council ofIndia:
H
ASHISH RANJAN v, UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 83
. [ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.) ,
"In order to ascertain the number of seats that still remain A
vacant after the counseling the State Government or the
authority designated by the State Government shall conduct
manual counselling for allotment of students. After the
completion counselling, the State Government shall determine
the number of seats that are still vacant and thereafter shall
B
forward a list of students in order of merit, equalling "to ten
times the number of vacant seats to the medical college so ·
that in case of any stray vacancy arising in any college the
said seat may be filled up from the said list,"
2. In view of the above, all the State/UT Governments are
requested to conduct mop-up round of counseling first. After c
the completion of mop-up counseling, the number of seats .
that are still vacant may be determined and list of students in
order of merit, equalling to ten times the number of vacant
seats shall then be forwarded to the medical colleges
concerned. In any case, last date of admission i.e. 31.05.2017 D
will remain unchanged.
·Yours. sincerely,
Sd/-
(D. V. K. Rao)
Under Secretary to the Government of India E
Tele: 011-2306 2959"
12. One of the issues which has been raised in these Applications
is with regard to the applicability of the order dated 09.05.2017 with
regard to the Postgraduate Courses.
13. Shri Gaurav Sharma has referred to order dated 03.05:2017 F
passed in Writ Petition (C) No.261 of2017 and other Writ Petitions
where this Court afterhearing learned counsel for the parties has passed
the following directions:
"Having heard learned counsel/or the parties and keeping
in view our earlier order passed in W.P.(C) No.270 of 2017 G
on 27th Marc'h, 2017, it is directed as under:-
(a) The concerned State.s which have been arrayed as
respondents herein, shall carry out the counseling and the
authorized representatives of the colleges who are the
H
84 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [20.17] 4 S.C.R.
A petitioners herein, shali remain present at the time of
counseling.
(b) When the counseling co1)lmences, the authorized
representatives who have been directed to remain personally
present, 1iiay assist the counseling authorities for allocation
B of students to their colleges from a11101igst the minorities on
the basis of their merits.
(c) The decision taken in the. counseling committee shall be
implemented .by the colleges so that har111017y is maintained.
(d) The representatives of the colleges shall identify the f:tatus
c of minority, but what will ultimately prevail is that the
candidate belonging to minority candidate must fit into the
compartment of merits. To clarify, if a student is meritorious
and beiongs to the minority community, he shall hai>e priority
in admission.
D (e) The 70% of the seats shall be filled up fi'om amo11gst the
minority stude11ts and bala11ce shall be.filled up by the general
'category. In case, there are il~adequate students meeting the
criteria, that is, minority status and merit,· then the same shall
be filled up on consent.from other cat1:;gories.
E The aforesaid order covers filling up of posts in .the post
graduate courses. As there is dual prayer i11 these writ
petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses, let the
\vrit petitio11s be listed on 4th May, 2017, only for the said
relief" .
F 14. A perusal of the aforesaid order indicates that the next date
that is 41h May, 2017 was fixed for consideration of relief pertaining to
. Urider-Graduate <:;ourses .. Shri .SJ1arma submits that the matter could
' not be heard on 04.05.2017 on which date it was adjourned to 08.05.20.17
and ultimately order was passed Oli 09:05.2017.A perusal of the diredion .·
Nos:&, 9'and 10 indicate that the directions pertain to admlssion of the
G
students belonging to minority community which directions have be.en
quoted below:
"8. In the applica,tions submitted by the stude1its belonging to
the minority community they should con.firm their minority
status as well as the fact that they fulfill other conditions which
H
· · ASHISH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 85
[ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.]
may be prescribed by the minority institutions. Accordingly. A
the DGHS as well as the State Government shall prepare a
separate list of minority students seeking admissions in the
respective minority institutions in order of merit. The competent
authorities of the College present during counseiling shall
check/verify the minority status of the candidate. This
B
arrangement is only meant for the State Quota.
9. During the common counselling conducted by the State
Government, the representatives of the ·medical colleges
particularly representative of minority institutions should be
a part of the admission/counselling committee as the case may
be. c
10. Common counselling conducted by the DGHS/State
Government will not in any manner a.ffectthe rights of m,inority
institutions to admit students of their respective minority
community. The ·minority quota seats, if any, in institutions
run by minorities will be filled up by minority students only. D
Therefore, the rights of minority· institutions are fully
·protected. "
15. A perusal of directions issued on 03.05.2017 clearly indicate
that with regard to admi.ssion of candidates belonging to minority
community several directions were already issued with regard to the E
admission in Post-graduate courses as per order dated 03.05.2017. When
this Court has already issued an order ensuring students of minority
conimunity be admitted after proper verificatio11on03.05.20i7 itself,
there was no occasion to issue further directions on the saine subject on.
09.05.2017, ifboth the orders relate to Post-graduate admissions. This F
clearly gives support to the submission made by the learned counsel of
Medical Counsel of India that order dated 09.05.2017 confines to
admission to Under-Graduate Courses.
16.ln order dated 03.05.2017 following was specifically mentioned:
" "The aforesaid order covers filling zip of posts in rhe post .G
· • graduate courses. As there is dual prayer in these writ
petitions, which also relate to under graduate courses. let the
writ petitions be listed on 4'" May, 2017, only for the said
relief" ·
H
86 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.
A 17. Above order dated 03 .05.2017 clearly indicates that matter
was to be further listed on 04.05.2017 for considering the relief relating
to Under-Graduate Courses. On 4m May, 2017 matter could not be taken
up and adjourned to 08.05.2017 and ultimately order was issui:d on
09.05.2017. Thus, order dated 09.05.2017 has been reproduced above
in reference to above paragraph. The above paragraph of order dated
B
03 .05.2017 clearly supports the contention ·of Shri Shanria that order
dated 09.05.2017 relates to admission of Under-Graduate.
18. The order passed by this Cou1t on 27'h April, 2017 in Writ
Petition {C) No.270 of2017 when read with order of this Court dated
09.05.2017 passed in Writ Petition (C) Nos.267, 292, 270 of2017 also
c leads to the same conclusion. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 in Writ
Petition(C)No.270 of2017 also contains various directions for academic
year 2017-2018 in reference to Post-graduate admissions. In Writ Petition
(C) No.270 of20l 7 following order was passed:
"W.P. CC) No.27012017
D
Heard Mr. Sun/I Gupta, learned senior counsel along
with Mr. Romy Chacko, learned counsel for the petitioners
and Mr. Vikas Singh, learned senior counsel along with M1:
Gaurav .Sharma, learned counsel for the respondents.
E As stated on the earlier occasion, memoral1da have been
filed by both the parties indicating solutions. The solutions
that ha\Je been arrived at after due deliberation for the present
academic year i.e. 2017-2018 are as follows:-
(i) The authorized representatives of the colleges, who are
petitioners herein, shall remain present at the time of
F
counseling. We have used the. word 'counseling' as Mr. Gupta,
teamed senior counsel has submitted that the first counseling
has not yet been done in respect of these colleges. Mr. Vikas
Singh, learned senior counsel would submit that when there
. is a C0/111110n counseling, ·(he question of ho/ding counse/ing
G for four. institutions does not arise. Be that as it may, that
need not be adverted to at the pr.esent.
(ii) The second counseling is going to take place on 11th
May, 2017. On that day, the authorized representative of the
petitioner-colleges shall remain present and students shall be
H
AS HI SH RANJAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND. OTHERS 87
[ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.]
allocated to their colleges on the basis of merits: Needless to A
say, t~e counseling shall be done by the State or anx university
or authority that has been nominated by the State.
(iii) At the time of counseling, the candidates who are inclined
to take admission in these colleges shall furnish an
undertaking that they will do service in the Mission Hospitals B
connected with the present colleges after completion of the
post-graduate course for a period WP(C) 261117 7 of one
. year.
(iv) Th~ aforesaid prescription shall only be applicable to the
minority students admitted by the petitioner-colleges on the c
basis of the common counseling. The representative of the
colleges shall identify the status of minority, but what will
ultimately prevail is that the minority candidate must fit into
the compartment of merits. To clarify, if a studei1t is meritorious
· and belongs to the minority community, he shall have the
priority in admission. D
· (v) The decision taken in the counseling committee shall bi
implemented by the colleges so that harmony is maintained. .
The present order shall apply only to the post graduate
admissions. E
As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is
concerned, Mr. Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come
up with set up of solutions.
Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4 th May,
2017." F
19. Writ Petition (C) No.270of2017 along with other Writ Petitions
were listed on 4rh May, 2017, as directed on which date matter was
adjourned to 8'h May, 2017. Ultim~tely, order dated 9rh May, 2017 was
passed in Writ Petition (C)Nos.267, 292, 270, 227 and 258 of2017. It
has already been referred to above. Order dated 27'h April, 2017 as G
extracted above specifically mentioned:
" .... The present order shall apply only to ·the postgraduate
admissions.
As far as the issue regarding under-graduate course is
H
88 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 4 S.C.R.
concerned, Ml: Vikas Singh, prays for three days time to come
up with set up of solutions.
Let the matter be listed for the said purpose on 4'h May, 2017."
20. Thus, 41h May, 2017 which was fixed and ultimately \vhen
order dated 91h May, 2017 was passed same was only in reference to
B Under-Graduate Course.
21. There is one more reason for coming up to the aforesaid
In
conclusion. order dated 09.05.2017, the State Government has been
directed to determine the number of seats that are still vacant and
. thereafter is to forward a list of students i~ prderofmerit, equalling to
ten times the number of vacant seats to the Medical College so that in
case of any stray vacancy arising in any College the said seat may be
filled up from the said list. Jn admission to the Post-graduate Courses
both merit and preference of candidates are looked into. Had the Court
vide direction No.7 of the order dated 09.05.2017 intended the sending
D of ten times the number of vacancies of each Post-graduate Courses,
there would have been further elaboration pertaining to discipline and
drawing of inter se merit.
22. We are, thus, of the considered view that order dated
09.05.2017 does not relate to admissio.n into Post-graduate Courses and
E is confined to admission in Under-Graduate Courses as noted above.
23. Coming to circular issued by the Government oflndia, Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare dated 26'h May, 2017, the said circular
has been issued on the strength of the order of this Court dated 09.05.2017
in Writ Petition (C) No.267 of2017. It appears that the said circular has .
been issued by Government ·of lndia, Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare in misconception that order dated 09.05.20 I7 is applicable to
the admission to the Post-graduate Courses. When the order dated
09.05.2017 is itself not applicable to Post-graduate Courses, circular
dated 26.05.2017 is not effective.
24, W,e are, thus, of the view that very basis of the Applications
G
filed by the Applicants is unfounded and Applicants are not entitled to
any relief in these Applications. All the IAs are rejected. . .
Nidhi Jain IAs. rejected.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "admission counselling"Sign in to search