Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

ALL INDIA IMAM ORGANISATION AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation
1993 INSC 200
Decided
13 May 1993
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Holding

Imams are entitled to reasonable remuneration, and the Wakf Boards must ensure payment as per a scheme framed under Section 15 of the Wakf Act, 1954.

Summary

The All India Imam Organisation filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking basic wages for imams serving in mosques, alleging exploitation and a disparity between their duties and remuneration. The Union of India and various State Wakf Boards contended that imams are appointed by mutawallis or local communities, perform voluntary religious service, and that the Boards lack the authority and financial capacity to pay them. The Supreme Court held that under Section 15 of the Wakf Act, 1954 the Wakf Board has supervisory, administrative and financial responsibilities, including ensuring proper maintenance of religious services, and that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to live with human dignity, which includes reasonable remuneration. Financial difficulties of the Boards cannot override fundamental rights. Consequently, the Court directed the Union and the Central Wakf Board to prepare a scheme within six months for payment of wages to imams, using the Punjab‑Haryana pay scales as a guideline, with provisions for different categories of mosques. The order became effective on 1 December 1993, and the petition was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether imams serving in mosques are employees of the Wakf Boards entitled to wages under the Wakf Act, 1954.
  • Whether the right to life, liberty and dignity under Article 21 (and Articles 14, 23) obliges the State to provide remuneration to imams.
  • Whether financial constraints of the Wakf Boards can defeat the fundamental rights of imams.
  • Whether Section 15 of the Wakf Act imposes a duty on the Board to ensure payment of remuneration to imams.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Wakf ActImam remunerationFundamental rightsArticle 21EmploymentReligious institutionsSchemeSupreme Court of India

Judgment

A               ALL INDIA IMAM ORGANISATION AND ORS.

                                          v.

                           UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

                    [K.RAMASW AMY AND R.M. SABAi, JJ .]
B
                                   MAY 13,1993
            Wakf Act 1954: Ss 15, 36-Payment ofwages to Imams in mosques-Held,
    it is the responsibility of the Wakf Board-Directions to Union of India and the
    Central Wakf Board to prepare a scheme within six months for different types of
c   mosques-Constitution of India, Articles 21, 14 and 23.                            ..-

          A petition was fded in this court by Imams for enforcing their fundamen-
    tal right against exploitation by WakfBoards. Their claim was based on the
    glaring disparity between the nature of work and the amount of remunera-
    tion. The petitioners sought a direction to the Central and State Wakf Boards
D   to pay them basic wages. A higher pay scale was claimed for degree holders.

          The Union oflndia and various State WakfBoards disputed the manner
    of their appointment, their right to receive any payment, and absence of any
    relationship of master and servant. It was variously con~nded that they were
    appointed by Mutwallis, or in some cases by the people of the locality where
E
    th~ mosques were situated, and not by the Wakf Boards;. that under Islamic
    religious practice it is voluntary service and there is no entidement to
    emoluments; that a certificate from a registered institution is not a necessary
    requirement for leading in prayer. It was further contended that the Wakf
    Boards faced financial difficulties.
F
         The Punjab Wakf Board stated that Imams of mosques in Punjab,
    Haryana and Himachal Pradesh were paid on the basis of their qualification.
    A pay scale was indicated, and the Imams were paid regularly and treated as
    regular employees.
G
         Allowing the petition, this Court,

         HELD: (1) By Section 15 of the Wakf Act, the WakfBoard is ".ested not
    only with supervisory and administrative powers over the Wakfs but even the
    fin~ncial power vests. in it. One of the primary duties is to ensure that the
H   income from the Wakf is spent on carrying out the purposes for which the
                                        742
                          IMAM ORGANISATION v. U,0.1.                          743

      Wakf was created. Mosques are Wakfs and are required to be registered A
      under the Act. over which the Board exercises control. Purpose of their
      creation is community worship. The principal functionary to undertake it is
      the Imam. It is the responsibility of the Wakf Board to ensure proper
      maintenance of religious service in a mosque. To say, therefore, that the
      Board has no control over the mosque or Imam is not correct. (747-G-H, 748- B
      A)                     .


            (2) In a series of decisions rendered by this Court ii has been held that
      right to life enshrined in Article 21 means right to live with human dignity. It
      is too late in the day to urge that since Imams perform religious duties, they
      are not entitled to emoluments. (748-E)                                          C

            (3) Financial difficulties of the institution cannot be above fundamental
      right of a citizen. If the Boards have been entrusted with the responsibility of
      supervising and administering the Wakf then, it is their duty to harness
      resources to pay those persons who perform the most important duty namely D
      of leading community prayer in a mosque, the very purpose for which it is
      created. (748-H)

          (4) The Union of India and the Central Wakf Board are to prepare a
      scheme within a period of six months in respect ofdifferent types of mosques:
      (749~.S)
                                                                                      E


           The scheme shall take guidance from the scale of pay prevalent in the
           State Punjab and Haryana. (749-D)

            Mosques under control of the government will not be governed by           F
            this order except if their Imams are not paid any remuneration and
            have no independent means of income. The Government may then
            fax their emoluments on the basis as the Central WakfBoard may do
            for other mosques. (749-C)

                                                                                      G
     , The State Boards shall ascertain the income of each mosque and the number
       and nature of Imams required-full time or part time-and their. payment is


--     directed. (749-E)

      The scheme shaH take account of mosques which are small, or in
      the rural area, or which have no source of income and find H
     744                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS                             [1993) 3 S.C.R.


A   ways to raise income. (749-G)

    The order for payment to Imams shall come into operation from 1 December
    1993. Every State Board shall implement the scheme. (749-H, 750-A)


B          ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.: Writ Petition (c) No. 715of1990.

           Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.

          GobindaMukhoty, R.K. Jain, YusufH. Machhale, Ms. K. Amreswari, (N.P)
    R.N. Sachthey, N.N. Goswamy, Ashwani kumar, Mukesh K.Giri, A.K. Sharma,
c   B.K. Prasad, (N.P) Ms. Anil Katiyar, Ms. Niranjana Singh, S. Wasim A. Qadri,
    B .K. Prasad. Nafis Ahmad Siddiqui, As gar Ali Khan, A.S. Bhasme, E.M.S. Anam,
    Sakil Ahmed Syed, Anil K. Jha, Raj Kumar Mehta, S.K. Agnihotri, B.R. Jad, Anip
    Sachthey, Syed Ali Ahmed, Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Mohan Pandey, M. Veerappa,
    K.H. Nobin Singh S.K. Mehta, Dhruv Mehta, Aman Vachher, P.K. Manohar, B.B.
D   Singh, Aruneshwar Gupta and R.Mohan for the appearing parties.

           The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

           R.M. SA HAI, J. Imams, 'incharge of religious activities of the mosque'(!)
E   have approached this court by way of this, representative, petition under Article
    32 of the Constitution for enforcement of fundamental right against their exploi-
    tation by W akfBoards. Relief sought is direction toCentral and State W akfBoards
    to treat the petitioner as employees of the Board and to pay them basic wages to
    enable them to survive. Basis of claim is glaring disparity between the nature of
    work and amount of remuneration. Higher pay scale is claimed for degree holders.
F
           Imams perform the duty of offering prayer (Namaz) for congregation in                   ...,.
    mosques. 'Essentially the m?sque is a centre of community worship where
    Muslims perform ritual prayers and where historically they have also gathered for
    political, social and cultural functions'. (2) The functions of the mosque is
G   summarised by the 13th Century jurist lbn Taymiyah 'as a place of gathering
    where prayer was celebrated and when public affairs were conducted'. (3) 'All.
    mosques are where Muslim men on an equalitarian basis rich or poor, noble or
    humble, stand in rows to perform theirprayersbehindtheimam(4)1mamsareexpected
    to look after the cleanliness of nXlsque, call azans from the balcony of the minarets to the   --
    whole religious meetings and propagate the Islamic faith. They are expected to be
H                                                                                                  \
                   IMAM ORGANISATION 1•. U.0.1. [SAHA!, J]                       745

well versed in the Shariat, the holy Quran, the Hadiths, ethics, philosophy, social,     A
economic and religious aspects. 'Imam or prayer leader is the most important
appointee. In the early days the ruler himself filled this role; he was leader (imam)
of the government of war, and of the common salat ("ritual prayer"). Under th~
Abbasids, when the caliph no longer conducted prayers on a regular basis, a paid
imam was appointed. While any prominent or learned Muslim can have the honor
of leading prayers, each mosque specifically appoints a man well versed in               B
theological matters to act as its imam. He is in charge of the religious activities of
the mosque, and it is his duty to conduct prayers five times a day in front of
Mihrab '. (5) On nature of the duties performed by the imams there is no dispute.
But both the Union of India and various State Wakf Boards of different States
which have put in appearance in response to the notice issued by this Court have         c
seriously disputed the manner of their appointment, right to receive any payment
and absence of any relationship of master and servant. It is stated that the imams
or muazzins are appointed by the Mutwallis. According to them the WakfBoards
have nothing to do either with their· appointment or working. It is claimed that
under Islamic religious practice they are not entitled to any emoluments as a matter
of right as the Islamic law ordains the imams to offer voluntary service. They are       D
said to be paid some money out of the donations received in mosques or by the
Mutwallis of the Boards. Their job is stated to be honorary and not paid. Nature
of duty under Islamic Shariat is stated to lead prayers which is performed
voluntarily by any suitable Muslim without any monetary benefit. Some of the
affidavits claim that they are appointed by people of the locality. The. Union           E
Government has specifically stated that the Islam does not recognise the concept
of priesthood as in other religions and the selection ofimams is the sole prerogative
of the members of the local commu~ity or the managing committee, if any, of the
mosque. According to Karnataka Wakf Board Imamate in the mosque is not
considered to be employment. The allegation of the. petitioners that due to meagre
 payment they are humiliated or insulted in the society, is denied and it is claimed     F
 that they are respectable persons who carry on the duty of Imamate as a part of
 rel!gious activity and not for earning bread and butter. The Delhi Wakf Board
 pointed out that the honorarium is paid to an imam as a consideration for his five
 time presence in the mosque regularly and punctually. The Board has denied any
 right to exercise an authority over the mosque where imams and muazzins are             G
 appointed by the mutwallis or by the managing committees. It is stated that holding
 of a certificate from a registered institution to enable a person to lead the prayer
 is not necessary as the only requirement for being an imam under the Shariat is to



       (I} to (5) The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol.I 0 p-121-122                         H
     746                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS                        LJ99313 S.C.R.


A           have a thorough knowledge of the hely Quaran and the rites, rules and
    obligations required for offering prayers according to the principles laid down by
    the Kuran and Sunnah. The affidavit filed on behalf ofW akf Board has pointed out
    that mosque can be categorised in five categories, one, which are under direct
    control or management of the Government such as Mecca Masjid or the mosque
    situated in public garden which are not governed or regulated by the Muslim Wakf
B   Board; second, mosques which are under the direct management of Wakf Board;
    third, mosques which are under the control of mutwallis under various Wakfs
    according to the wishes of the Wakf as the creator of the Wakf; t:ourth, mosqu.es
    which are not registered with the Wakf Board and are managed by local inhabitants
    and are under the management of the public who offer prayers regularly in a
    particular mosque; and fifth, mosques which are not managed by mutwallis or the
    Muslims of the locality. It is claimed that imams of fourth and fifth category are
    not regular and any Muslim can lead the prayers, whereas undephe third category
    mosques are having regular imams. Financial difficulty of the WakfBoard to meet
    the demand has also been pointed out. The Pondicherry Wakf Board has pointed
    that there is not even one employee except a peon working therein and, therefore,
D   it is not possible to meet the demand of the imam. It is also claimed that the Board
    has no control over the pesh-imams as they are considered to be well dignified
    personality of the society and they are given due respect by the Muslim community
    as a whole. In the counter-affidavit filed by the Punjab Wakf Board it has been
    stated that imams of mosques in Punjab were being paid on basis of their
E   qualification. Imams Nazara (Mubtali grade) are in the scale of Rs. 380-20-580-
    25-830-30-980, whereas Imams Hafiz (Wasti grade) arc paid Rs. 445-20-645-25-
    895-30-1045, and Imam Alim (Muntali grade) are paid Rs. 520-20-720-25-970-
    30-1120. They are also paid Rs.30 per month medical allowance and muazzins are
    paid Rs. 310 per month. These scales were revised in 1992. According to them
    imams of all the mosques in Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh which come
F   under the Punjab Wakf Board are being paid regularly and they are treated as
    regular employees. The Sunni Central Wakf Board ofUttar Pradesh filed only a
    written submission stating that all the sunni mosques were managed by mutwallis
    of the concerned managing committees and not by the Wakf Board.

G         The mosque differs from a church or a temple in many respects. ·ceremonies
    and service connected with marriages and birth are never performed in mosques.
    The rites that are important and integral functions of many churches such as
    confessions, penitences and confirmations do not exist in the mosques. (6) Nor any
    offerings are made as is common in Hindu temples. 'In Muslims countries
    mosques are subsidised by the States, hence no collection of money from the
                                                                                           --
H   community is permitted. The Ministry of Wakf (Endowments) appoints the
                          IMAM ORGANISATION 1•. U.O.I. [SAHA!. J]               747

    servant, preachers and readers of the Koran. Mosques in non-Muslim countries are A
    subsidised by individuals. They are administered by their founder or by their
    special fund. A caretaker is appointed to keep the place clean. The muazzin cells
    to prayer five times a day from the minaret. (7) In our country in I954 Wakf Act
    was passed by the Parliament for better administration and supervision ofWakfs.
    To achieve the objective of the Act Section 9 provides for establishment ofa Wakf B
    Board the functions of which are detailed in Section 15. Sub-section (1) ofit reads
    as under:

                        "( l) Subject to any rules that may be made under this Act, the

-                 (general superintendence of all wakfs in State in relation to all
                  matters, except those which are expressly required by this Act to be C
                  dealt with by the Wakf Commissioner, shall ·vest) in _the Board
                  established for the State; and it shall be the duty of the Board so to
                  exercise its powers under this Act a<; to ensure that the Wakfs under
                  its superintendence are properly maintained controlled and admin-
                  istered and the income thereof is duly applied to the objects and for D
                  the purposes for the objects and for the purposes for which such
                  wakfs were created or intended ;

                        Provided that in exercising its powers under this Act in respect
                  of any wakf, the Board shall act in conformity with the directions of
                  the Wakf, the purposes of the wakf and any usage or custom of the E
                  wakf sanctioned by the Muslim law"'.

                        Clause (b) of Sub-section (2) obliges the board "to ensure that
                  the income and other propeny of a wakf are applied to the,{Jbjects
                  and for the purposes for which that wakfwascreated or intended''.        F
           The board is vested not only with supervisory and administrative powers
    over the wakfs but even the financial power vests in it. One of its primary duties
    is to ensure that the income from the wakf is spent on carrying out the purposes for
    which wakf was created.
         Mosques are wakfs and are required to be registered under the Act over G
    which the board exercises control. Purpose of their creation is community
    worship. Namaz or Salat is the mandatory practice observed in every mosque.
    '(Among the Five Pillars (arkan; sg., rukn) of Islam, it holds the second most
    import, position, immediately after the declaration of faith (shahadah)' (8). The

          (6) & (7) Encyclopedia, Britannica Vol. 18 P. 883                                H
          (8) The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol. 13 P. 20-21
      748                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS                          [ 1993] 3 S.C.R.


A          principal functionary to undertake it is the Imam. The objective and purpose
                                                                                              -
    of every mosque being community worship and it being the obligation of board
    under the Act to ensure that the objective of the wakf is carried on the Board cannot
    escape from its responsibility for proper mainten.ance of religious service in a
    mosque. To say, therefore, that the Board has no control over the mosque or Imam
    is not correct. Absence of any provision in the Act or the rules providing for
B
    appointment of Imam or laying down condition of their service is probably
    because they are not considered as employees. At the same time it cannot be
    disputed that due to change in social and economic set-up they too need suste-
    nance. Nature of their jolr is such that ,they may be required to be present in the

c
    mosque nearly for the whole day. There may be some who may perform the duty
    as part of their religious observance. Still others may be ordained by the commu-
    nity to do so. But there are large number of such persons who have·no other
                                                                                              -
    occupation or profession or service for their livelihood except doing duty as Imam.
    What should be their fate? Should they be paid any remuneration and if so how
    much and by whom? According to the Board they are appointed by the mutwallis
    and, therefore, any payment by the board was out of question. Primafacie it is not
D   correct as the letter of appointments issued in some states are from the Board. But
    assuming that they are appointed by the Mutwallis the Board cannot escape from
    its responsibility as the mutwallis too u/s. 36 of the Act are under the supervision
    and control of the Board. In series of decisions rendered by this Court it has been
    held thatright to life enshrined in Article 21 means right to live with human dignity.
E   It is too late in the day, therefore, to claim or urge that since Imams perform
    religious duties they are not entitled to any emoluments. Whatever may have been
    the ancient concept but it has undergone change and even in Muslim countries
    mosques are subsidised and the Imams are paid their remuneration. We are,
    therefore, not willing to accept the submission that in our set up or in absence of
    any statutory provision in the Wakf Act the imams who look after the religious
F   activities of mosques are not entitled to any remuneration. Much was argued on
    behalf of Union and the Wakf Boards that their financial position was not such that
    they can meet the obligations of paying the imams as they are being paid in the
    State of Punjab. It was also urged that the number of mosques is so large that it
    would entail heavy expenditure which the boards of different States would not be
    able to bear. We do not find any co-relation between the two. Financial difficulties
G
    of the institution cannot be above fundamental right ofa citizen. If the boards have
    been entrusted with the responsibility of supervision and administering the wakf
    then it is their duty to.harness resources to pay those persons who perform the most
    important duty namely ofleading community prayer in a mosque the very purpose
    for which it is created.
H
                        IMAM ORGANISATION\'. U.0.1. [SAHA!. J]                    749

         In the circumstances we allow this petitions and issue following directions A



          (i) The Union of India and the Central Wakf Board will prepare a scheme
    within a period of six months in respect of different types of mosques some detail
    of which has been furnished in the counter affidavit filed by the Delhi Wakf Board.   B

          (ii) Mosques which are under control of the Government shall not be
    governed by this order. But if their imams are not paid any remuneration and they


-
    have no independent income. The Government may fix their emoluments on the
    basis as the Central Wakf Board may do for other mosques in pursuance of our
    order.                                                                            C

          (iii) For other mosques, except those which are not registered with the Board
    of their respective States or which are not manned by members oflslamic faith the
    scheme shall provide for payment of remuneration to such Imams taking guidance
    from the scale of pay prevalent in the State of Punjab and Haryana.                 D

         (iv) The State Board shall ascertain income of each mosque the number and
    nature of Imams required by it namely full time or part time.

          (v) For the full time Punjab WakfBoard may be treated as a guideline. That E
    shall also furnish guideline for payment to part time imam.

          (vi) In all those mosques where full time Imams are working they shall be
    paid the remuneration determined in pursuance of this order.

         (vii) Part time and honorary Imam shall be paid such remuneration and            F
    allowance as is determined under the scheme.

           (viii) The scheme shall also take into account those mosques which are small
    or are in the rural area or are such as mentioned in the affidavit of Pondichery Board
    and have no source of income and find out ways and mean_s to raise its income. G

          (ix) The exercise should be completed and the scheme be enforced within six
    mon~hs.



          (x) Ourorder for paymentto Imams shall come into operation from 1st Dec.,
                                                                                          H
    750                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS                         (1993) 3 S.C.R.


A   1993. In case the scheme it not prepared within the time allowed then it shall
    operate retrospectively from 1st December, 1.993. ·

         (xi) The scheme framed by the Central Wakf Board shall be implemented
    by every State Board.
B
           The Writ Petition is decided accordingly. Parties shall bear their own costs.
                                                                                            -
    U.R.                                                              Petition allowed.

                                                                                            -




                                                                                            -


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Wakf Act"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.