Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

ABID HUSSAIN AND OTHERS ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation
1987 INSC 22
Decided
22 January 1987
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Holding

The denial of overtime allowance to the Northern Railway Air‑Conditioned Coach Incharges‑Attendants, while it is paid to their counterparts in other railways, is unjustified and violates the equality principle under Article 14, warranting the payment of the allowance.

Summary

The petitioners, Air‑Conditioned Coach Incharges‑Attendants of the Northern Railway, filed writ petitions under Article 32 alleging they were denied overtime allowance that their counterparts in the Western, Central and Eastern Railways received for extra duty exceeding 96 hours in two weeks. They claimed this differential treatment violated the equality guarantee of Article 14. The Court examined the claim and found no justification for the disparity in payment. It held that the denial of overtime allowance was unconstitutional. Consequently, the Court directed the Union of India and the Railway Administration to pay the overtime allowance to the Northern Railway employees with effect from July 1 1984 and to settle all arrears within four months, extending the benefit to all such employees, including retirees. The writ petitions were allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the denial of overtime allowance to Air‑Conditioned Coach Incharges‑Attendants of the Northern Railway, while it is paid to their counterparts in other zones, violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
  • Whether the petitioners can invoke Article 32 to obtain a direction for payment of the overtime allowance.

Legislation cited

Subjects

overtime allowancediscriminationequalityArticle 14Article 32railway employeespublic serviceconstitutional law

Judgment

                         ABID HUSSAIN AND OTHERS ETC.
                                                                                    A
                                                 v.
                               UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

                                    JANUARY 22, 1987

                [E.S VENKATARAMIAH AND M.P. THAKKAR, JJ.]                           B

                Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 32: :Air-Conditioned Coach
           Incharges-Attendants, Northern Railway-Discriminated against in
           payment of overtime allowance-Held not justified.
                                            /



                  The petitioners, Air-Conditioned Coach Incbarges-Attendants C
            in Northern Railway, contended in their writ petitions that their
            counterparts in Western, Central and Eastern Railways were being
           .Paid overtime allowance for extra duty hours exceeding 96 hours in two
            weeks, and sought a direction to the Union of India and Railway
            Administration to pay them the same allowance.
                                                                                   D
•                 Allowing the writ petition, the Court,

                HELD: There was no justification for denying overtime
           allowance to the petitioners working in the Northern Railway. The
           Union of India and the Railway Administration to pay with effect from
           June 1, 1984 overtime allowance to the petitioners on the same basis on E
           which their counterparts in the other three Railways are paid. l48B-C]


-                The benefit of the order to be extended to all such employees
           including those who have retired and those who have not joined as
           petitioners. [48D l
                                                                                    F
    (. ·       All arrears of such allowances uptodate to be paid within four
     \     mouths. l48D]

                 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) Nos.13748-84
           of 1984 ..
                                                                                    G
                                                With

                 Writ Petition (c) Nos. 15806-26of 1984.

                 (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.)
                                                                                    H

                                                 47
    48                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS           [1987] 2 S.C.R.

         N.N. Keshwani and IR.N. Keshwani for the Petitioners.
A
         O.P. Sharma, Girish Chandra, C.V. Subba Rao and Miss S.
    Relan for the Respondentn.

         The following Order of Court was delivered:
B
        It is not disputed that the Air-conditioned Coach Incharges-
  Attendants are being paid overtime allowances for extra duty hours         ( ..
  exceeding 96 hours in two weeks in the Western Railway, Central
  Railway and Eastern Railway. There is no justification for deuying         +
  overtime allowances on the same basis to the Air-conditioned Coach                ;,......
C Jncharges-Attendants in the Northern Railway. We accordingly direct
  the Union of India and the Railway Administration to pay with effect
  from July 1, 1984 the overtime allowance to the Air-conditioned
  Coach lncharges-Attendants working in the Northern Railway on the
  same basis on which the Air-conditioned Coach Incharges-Attendants
  in the other three Railways, referred to above, are paid. All arrears of
D such allowances upto date shall be paid as early as possible and in any
  eveni not later than four months from today. The benefit of this order
  shall be extended to all such employees including those who have
  retired and those who have not joined as petitioners herein.

         The Writ Petitions are allowed. No costs.
E
    P.S.S.                                              Petitions allowed.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "overtime allowance"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.