Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Partnership Act, 1932

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SACHIN JAISWALversusM/S HOTEL ALKA RAJE & OTHER

2025 INSC 27527 February 2025Dismissed

The appellant, Sachin Jaiswal, challenged a High Court clarification that the land and hotel building contributed by his late father to the partnership firm M/s Hotel Alka Raje constituted the firm's property under Section 14 of the Partnership Act, 1932. The father had purchased the land in 1965, entered into a partne

RAHUL VERMA & ORS.versusRAMPAT LAL VERMA & ORS.

2025 INSC 29621 February 2025Dismissed

The dispute involved a partnership firm where two of the three partners had died, and the legal heirs of one deceased partner sought to enforce an arbitration clause in the partnership deed to resolve a claim for rendition of accounts. The respondents argued that the heirs, being non‑signatories to the deed and without

SUNKARI TIRUMALA RAO & ORS.versusPENKI ARUNA KUMARI

2025 INSC 9217 January 2025Dismissed

The petitioners, partners of an unregistered partnership firm, filed a suit seeking recovery of Rs 30 lakhs from another partner of the same firm. The trial court held the suit maintainable, but the High Court reversed, invoking Section 69(1) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which bars suits by partners of an unreg

DHANASINGH PRABHUversusCHANDRASEKAR & ANOTHER

2025 INSC 83114 July 2025Case Allowed

The appellant, Dhanasingh Prabhu, advanced a loan of Rs.21 lakh to the respondents who were partners of the partnership firm “Mouriya Coirs”. The respondents issued a cheque in the name of the firm which was dishonoured, prompting the appellant to serve a statutory notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS.versusM/S SHREE NIWAS RAMGOPAL & ORS.

2025 INSC 83214 July 2025Dismissed

The dispute arose when Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) stopped supplying kerosene to a partnership firm after one of its three partners died, despite the partnership deed stating that death would not dissolve the firm. The partnership filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing IOCL to continue supply unti

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search